With damage caused by cyber wreckers emerging as a social agenda, both ruling and opposition parties in the National Assembly have submitted amendments to the Information and Communications Network Act. The most direct way to add momentum to this current is the National Assembly's national-agreement petition. In consultations, we often hear that people want to agree but the procedure feels too complex, yet it really takes only one minute. Today we organize the procedure together with why this petition matters.
The damage caused by cyber wreckers, why legislation is urgent
The structure of cyber-wrecker content typically goes like this.
- Thumbnails and titles that provoke anger, fear, or arousal
- Videos and audio stitched together without fact-checking
- Targeting innocent individuals as objects of online witch-hunt for traffic
- Monetizing anger through Super Chat, donations, and ads
While a person daily life crumbles, the perpetrator takes in revenue. To correct this, legislative devices such as raised sentences and ill-gotten-gains forfeiture are essential.
Core of the bills proposed, ill-gotten-gains forfeiture and raised sentencing
The amendments to the Information and Communications Network Act proposed by both parties typically share the following direction.
- Forfeiture and additional collection of ill-gotten gains from cyber-wrecker activity
- Raised sentencing for insult and defamation
- Aggravated punishment for repeat offenders
- Strengthened rapid-removal obligations of platforms
While specific provisions differ by bill, the skeleton above is typically shared.
The weight of a national-agreement petition
The National Assembly national-agreement petition is formally referred to the relevant standing committee if 50,000 agreements are obtained within 30 days.
Even when a bill has already been introduced, the national-agreement petition is a powerful signal that quantifies how socially urgent this legislation is.
When parties already share consensus, passage of a petition typically accelerates subsequent legislative scheduling.
The petition agreement procedure, really one minute
- Agreement is possible without registration, as a non-member
- Works on both computer and mobile phone
- Identity verification via PASS authentication or SMS authentication
The concrete steps are:
- Click the Cyber-Wrecker Prevention Law national-agreement petition link
- Click the agree button at the bottom of the page
- If not a member, click confirm and choose identity verification
- Proceed with PASS or SMS verification
- Click the agreement button and complete
It typically takes about 10 to 20 seconds.
Common procedural misunderstandings
- The misunderstanding "you can not unless you register": non-members can also do it
- The misunderstanding "computer only": mobile works too
- The misunderstanding "only PASS authentication": SMS authentication is also available
- The misunderstanding "my information becomes public": the list of petition agreers is not made public externally
After the petition, what may change
Passage of the petition does not automatically complete legislation, but it has the following effects.
- Formal referral to the relevant standing committee and onto the agenda
- Combined with legislative proposals, debate schedules accelerate
- Additional media and public attention
- Expanded social discussion of the cyber-wrecker revenue structure itself
Other tools for victim protection
- Application for temporary measures under the Information and Communications Network Act (post blocking)
- Criminal complaint for defamation or insult
- Provisional injunction for post removal on the ground of personality-right infringement
- Damages claim
I typically advise victims early on to consider temporary measures and removal injunctions together. They are procedures that cut "spread itself" before the result of defamation hardens.
The loneliness of victims seen in consultations
The hardest aspect of cyber-wrecker damage cases is typically social isolation. As family, colleagues, and acquaintances fail to withstand the "curiosity" of internet videos, the victim grows increasingly alone. Legislation is, in the end, a social promise to reduce this loneliness.
FAQ
Q. If I agree to the petition, will my identity be made public?
A. The list of agreers is not made public externally; identity verification is collected only to ensure the integrity of the petition numbers.
Q. If we cannot reach 50,000, is the petition meaningless?
A. Even if the formal-referral threshold is not met, the numbers themselves are used as material showing the level of social attention.
Closing
I often see moments when victims of cyber-wrecker cases become the loneliest. Legislative change is the surest path to reducing that loneliness. The 10 to 20 seconds of a petition agreement may seem small, but added together they change the direction of society. If you have suffered similar harm or are interested, please take a moment to participate in the petition.
What victims families can do together
Cyber-wrecker damage recovery is typically not a fight one person fights alone. What family and acquaintances can do together includes:
- Saving URLs and screenshots of videos and posts in chronological order
- Collaborating on reports for defamation and insult posts
- Reporting fake-news distribution channels
- Supporting daily routines that aid emotional recovery
- Resetting the public range of one SNS
Stopping the "spark" before it spreads to other platforms is important.
Strengthening platform responsibility, legislative direction
Currently proposed amendments typically include a direction in which platforms share responsibility if they fail to act within a certain time after receiving a report. This reflects the reality that victims cannot chase down each piece of content one by one.
What you can do beyond the petition
- Sending opinion emails to lawmakers offices
- Joining civil-society activities
- Sharing the petition link on social media
- Personally informing two or three acquaintances of the petition
When the petition alone is insufficient, the above activities typically help accelerate legislation.
One-line conclusion
The petition looks small, but it is typically a social signal that directly shakes the legislative timeline. One minute of your time can change the next year for a victim.
Points where people often get stuck on the petition screen
Citizens typically get stuck at the following points on the actual petition site.
- Mistaking the login window as members-only
- Forced perception that PASS app installation is required at the identity-verification step
- Failing to return to the petition page after verification
- Closing without seeing the completion screen after clicking the agree button
Remember the order: identity verification, return to petition page, click agree, confirm completion screen, and it typically wraps in one minute.
Procedures that go alongside the petition
- Criminal complaint about the damage facts
- Application for temporary measures on the harmful video
- Provisional injunction on the ground of personality-right infringement
- Damages claim
Apart from the petition, individual victims typically use these tools to produce results for ongoing damage. The petition is a social signal; the individual tools are immediate-protection devices.
A conclusion to reiterate
Carrying out the petition and individual victim remedies simultaneously is typically the most effective.
Temporary measure application, the fastest tool at the start of the case
Temporary measures under the Information and Communications Network Act are typically a procedure to swiftly request the cessation of posting of defamatory or privacy-infringing information. When the victim applies directly, temporary blocking is typically achieved within 30 days, buying time to prepare full legal procedures (injunctions, criminal complaints, damages) in parallel.
Injunction, a procedure that cuts spread itself
A removal injunction on the ground of personality-right infringement is typically a procedure capable of swift decision. Used early, before spread hardens, it typically reduces recovery cost significantly.
A one-line summary citizens can join in
One minute of petition, one minute of reporting, one minute of sharing. When these three combine, the flow of a single case typically changes.
Basics of material preservation
What is most often missed early in a case is material preservation. Do not save only the link of a video; saving screenshots and meta information (upload time, author, platform) together typically helps in every subsequent procedure. Cloud backup additionally adds safety.
Even after the petition ends, what remains
Whether the petition is referred or not, participation in the petition itself remains in the legislative sensibility of society as a record. A single minute, accumulated, becomes an accumulating citizens signal and firms up the starting point of the next legislative discussion.
I would like to emphasize once more that no victim is alone.
Byline Author and reviewer: attorney Roh Jongeon. Reviewed: 2026-05-30
This article is a column intended to provide general information and does not guarantee any specific case outcome. Conclusions may differ depending on the concrete facts, so if you need legal advice for your circumstances, please consult an attorney.



